Policy may be necessary when workers refuse to give up perfume that cause coworkers illness
1232
Dear Joan:
We have several staff members that wear very strong perfume, which is causing others in the office to have headaches, nausea and sneezing. Our executive director suffers from severe allergies and asthma and she is also affected.
Our director put up signs all over the office stating “Scent Free Zone”. She advised staff not to wear perfume because others are allergic. This posting has not been enforced by some managers because it is not a policy.
Our management staff is now attempting to draft a policy stating that staff can not wear perfume or perfumed lotions. However, a couple members of our management team say this is taking away their civil liberties. I say that someone’s health is more important than wearing perfume. I then stated that those staff members could start going home sick and then obtain a doctor’s note that the perfume is causing them to be ill in the work place, which could open another can of worms.
Could you please send me some examples of policies that you know are solid and will work for our office? I would really like to present them at our managers’ meeting.
Answer:
This stinky situation is stinky; however, I side with you. I sympathize with your colleagues who feel as though this is just one more nick in their civil liberties, but in the case of an organization, where people are forced into close quarters, there may be little choice.
The issue of personal rights versus the organizations’ standards is always a little sticky. Employees want to wear wacky hair, pierce body parts, dress the way they want—but the organization is paying them to perform and conform to the needs of the organization. The organization needs employees to present a consistent, professional image to customers, as well as to behave safely and respectfully.
This situation is not entirely unlike banning smoking, since it is offensive and unhealthy to others. Since some people are allergic to scents, their health can be affected, so an employer should make a reasonable accommodation.
I’m not a fan of creating a policy for every possible misstep, but since the poster campaign failed to get a responsible response, a policy may be necessary. The individuals on the management team, who feel this is a violation of civil liberties, are probably the ones who failed to comply with the request. Now, unfortunately, they will be forced to comply, which is not the ideal situation. If they enforce it with a chip on their shoulders, or say, “I don’t agree with this policy but senior management is making me do it…” poor morale and negative feelings toward the company are the result.
I can only speculate that if all managers had spoken with their staff and explained the fact that some of their coworkers are having severe allergic reactions to something so easily fixed, the issue would have gone away.
Daniel Finerty, attorney with Krukowski & Costello, S.C. agrees that a conversation may be better than a policy in this case. “While no legal precedent dictates that such a “fragrance free” policy is required, an employer is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to engage in the interactive process with an employee to determine the appropriate accommodation for a disability. The question in any “fragrance sensitivity” case is whether the employee’s condition arises to the standard of a “disability” under federal or applicable state law, if the employee has requested accommodation for the problem or if the employer has responded reasonably. In most cases, the employee’s disability will likely not rise to that level.”
Perhaps there is still an opportunity to reach consensus among the leaders, so that a policy isn’t necessary. If not, a simple policy statement should be written and then talking points created so every manager can take the policy to their staff and have a consistent message.
The policy can be added to the dress code portion of your handbook and simply state, “Since perfumes and perfumed creams can cause serious allergic reactions in others, please refrain from their use during work hours.”
Internal Consulting Skills for HR Professionals is Joan Lloyd’s intensive, interactive full-day workshop for HR practitioners. Human resources professionals—both functional experts and generalists—have a new found opportunity to act as internal consultants who can help their organizations with organizational changes, performance coaching, conflict mediation and other value-added services. This workshop focuses on giving HR professionals the tools and strategies they need to help their organizations as well as advance their careers.
As a participant, you will have an opportunity to work on the problems and opportunities you face in your own organization, as well as to hear innovative ideas from other organizations. Few training opportunities provide this level of intimate, hands-on experience. Call us for information about having Joan Lloyd work with your HR Team (800) 348-1944. (Occasionally, we run this workshop as an open enrollment training offering. Subscribe to Joan Lloyd’s “Article of the Week,” where we announce these sessions, as they are scheduled.)
Joan Lloyd has a solid track record of excellent results. Her firm, Joan Lloyd & Associates, specializes in leadership development, organizational change and teambuilding. This includes executive coaching, 360-degree feedback processes, customized leadership & presentation skills training, team assessment and teambuilding and retreat facilitation. Joan also provides consulting skills training for HR professionals. Clients report results such as: behavior change in leaders, improved team performance and a more committed workforce.
Email Joan at
mailto:info@joanlloyd.com to: submit your question, for consideration for publication, request permission to reprint an article for distribution, or for information about carrying Joan Lloyd's weekly column in your publication, or on your Internet or Intranet site.
© Joan Lloyd & Associates, Inc.